• AgentsX
  • Posts
  • Can AI Reason Better by Arguing with Itself? Research Says Yes.

Can AI Reason Better by Arguing with Itself? Research Says Yes.

Why Humans Will Still Have Work?

What’s trending?

  • AI Agents Use Debate to Enhance Their Own Mathematical Reasoning

  • AI's Hacking Prowess

  • 3 Milestones for AI Agents

Your AI Trust Career Starts Here

Book your place at this free 45-minute virtual session. Discover how to move into the high-growth area of AI evaluation, no advanced programming or machine learning background necessary.

In this session, we will cover:

  • The Growing Opportunity: Understand why the rapid evolution of AI is creating urgent demand for professionals who can test and ensure its reliability.

  • Your Skillset Fit: Learn how to leverage experience from fields like product management, QA, data analysis, engineering, or risk control to enter AI trust and safety positions.

  • A Practical Roadmap: Receive a concrete 90-day strategy to gain relevant skills, participate in AI projects, and showcase your contributions.

Hosts: Srini Annamaraju & Shen Pandi
When: Friday, 19 December 2025, 5:00 PM GMT

What's Better Than One AI? Several, Arguing Over Math

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used worldwide for writing, coding, and research, but they remain prone to factual inaccuracies and logical inconsistencies, limiting their reliability in educational and professional contexts.

To address this, researchers from South China Agricultural University and Shanghai University of Finance and Economics have developed a new framework called Adaptive Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Debate (A-HMAD).

Published in the Journal of King Saud University Computer and Information Sciences, the system enhances LLM reasoning by prompting structured debates between multiple AI agents, each with a specialized role, to collaboratively refine answers.

Unlike previous approaches that relied on a single model or homogeneous agents, A-HMAD assigns each agent a distinct expertise (e.g., logical reasoning, factual verification, or strategic planning).

A coordination policy dynamically selects which agents participate as the debate evolves. To synthesize their arguments, the framework uses a "consensus optimizer" that evaluates each contribution based on reliability and confidence levels, ultimately guiding the group toward the most accurate and logically sound response.

In tests across six challenging problem types, including arithmetic, grade-school math, and factual biography generation, A-HMAD outperformed both single-model methods and standard multi-agent debate baselines.

It achieved 4–6% higher accuracy on reasoning tasks and reduced factual errors by over 30% in biography generation.

The authors, Yan Zhou and Yanguang Chen, note that this “adaptive, role-diverse debating ensemble” marks a step toward safer, more interpretable, and educationally reliable AI systems.

Future improvements could lead to AI platforms that assist educators, researchers, and professionals in sourcing accurate answers to complex questions with greater confidence.

The $50,000 Hacker? AI Agent Breaches Stanford Network in Under a Day

A new AI agent developed by Stanford researchers has demonstrated the ability to outpace human cybersecurity experts in identifying network vulnerabilities, and at a fraction of the cost.

In a controlled experiment, the AI agent ARTEMIS spent 16 hours scanning Stanford's computer science networks, comprising about 8,000 devices, and placed second among 10 professional human penetration testers.

According to the study, ARTEMIS uncovered security flaws that some human testers missed, including a vulnerability on an older server that human browsers could not access. The agent bypassed this obstacle using a command-line request.

Cost-Effective and Scalable

Operating ARTEMIS costs approximately $18 per hour, far below the average annual salary of $125,000 for a human penetration tester. A more advanced version costs $59 per hour, still cheaper than hiring a top-tier expert.

The researchers noted that existing AI tools struggled with complex, long-term security tasks, prompting them to develop ARTEMIS.

How ARTEMIS Works

The AI operates uniquely: when it detects something noteworthy during a scan, it automatically spins up additional "sub-agents" to investigate in the background.

This allows it to examine multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously, a task human testers must perform sequentially.

Within a 10-hour comparison window, ARTEMIS discovered nine valid vulnerabilities with an 82% valid submission rate, outperforming nine of the ten human participants.

Limitations and Risks

However, ARTEMIS is not flawless. It struggled with tasks involving graphical user interfaces (GUIs), causing it to overlook certain critical vulnerabilities. It is also more prone to false positives, sometimes misinterpreting harmless network messages as successful breaches.

Broader Implications: AI-Powered Threats on the Rise

The study underscores a broader trend: AI is lowering the barrier to hacking. Recent reports highlight that malicious actors are already leveraging AI models like ChatGPT and Claude for cyberattacks. For example:

  • A North Korean hacking group used ChatGPT to generate fake military IDs for phishing campaigns.

  • The same group used Claude to fraudulently obtain remote jobs at U.S. Fortune 500 companies, gaining insider access to corporate systems.

  • A Chinese threat actor employed Claude to execute cyberattacks against Vietnamese telecom, agricultural, and government targets.

Security experts warn that AI enables hackers to automate data extraction, system shutdowns, and website manipulation at an unprecedented scale.

While ARTEMIS represents a significant advance in automated cybersecurity defense, its development also highlights the dual-use nature of AI, offering powerful tools for both protecting and attacking digital infrastructure.

As AI capabilities grow, the line between human and machine in cybersecurity is rapidly blurring.

With Only 78 Examples, New Technique Creates Sophisticated AI Software Agents

Every technological revolution has its tipping point, and for AI agents, the autonomous systems that can reason, plan, and act, that moment is approaching rapidly.

While early adopters are already deploying agents to accelerate software development, streamline customer service, and innovate in fields like drug research and agriculture, widespread adoption hinges on overcoming three critical milestones, according to Swami Sivasubramanian, VP of Agentic AI at Amazon Web Services (AWS).

1. Transforming How Software is Built

Before AI agents become mainstream for end users, they must first become indispensable to the builders: software engineers, developers, and architects. Today, agentic tools are helping developers debug code, conceptualize architectures, and reduce manual overhead.

The goal is for agents to handle complex decisions, such as selecting the optimal compute infrastructure, freeing developers to focus on creative problem-solving rather than implementation details. For agents to scale, builders must find them both useful and interesting.

2. Establishing and Verifying Trust

Perhaps the most significant barrier is trust. Agents will make mistakes, but we must be able to verify their reasoning before delegating critical tasks. The solution lies in automated reasoning, a field rooted in mathematical logic that can prove whether a system behaves as intended.

By creating a feedback loop between an agent and an automated reasoning solver, agents can be guided toward verifiable correctness. For example, if an agent writes code for an API call, the solver can check it for errors in under 100 microseconds and recommend fixes, ensuring the output is trustworthy.

This fusion of agentic AI and mathematical verification is key to building reliable, widely adopted systems.

3. Democratizing AI Agent Creation

True transformation requires making agent creation accessible beyond expert developers. Consider the challenge of producing professional advertising creatives, which typically takes weeks and significant budgets.

Amazon Ads introduced AI agents that can research a brand, brainstorm creative concepts, and generate polished video and display ads—all in hours instead of weeks. However, this is about using agents, not building them.

The next leap is enabling non-technical users to create their own agents. “Today, any developer who knows Python can create a functional agent,” says Sivasubramanian. “But true democratization won’t happen until we significantly expand the pool of people who can make agents.”

This means integrating agent-building interfaces into tools people already use, lowering the technical barrier so that anyone can tailor agents to their needs.

The Agentic Future

Once these milestones are reached, Sivasubramanian envisions agents becoming as essential and invisible as electricity. They will accelerate innovation across every domain, speeding up medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and the launch of new companies.

The most profound impact, however, may be how agents amplify human creativity and ambition. When the barriers between idea and execution dissolve, innovation will advance at an unprecedented pace.

The question is no longer if AI agents will transform our world, but what we will choose to build once they do.

Stay with us. We drop insights, hacks, and tips to keep you ahead. No fluff. Just real ways to sharpen your edge.

What’s next? Break limits. Experiment. See how AI changes the game.

Till next time - keep chasing big ideas.

What's your take on our newsletter?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Thank you for reading